Handle every complaint, from first email to MHRA report
Complaint intake, report preparation, corrective actions and trend review in one case record.
| Case | Device | Severity | Clock | Owner | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PMS-0418Occlusion alarm not triggered | Infusion pump IP-200Lot 24-117 | High | 01d 06h | JPJ. Patel | Report drafting |
| PMS-0421Display flicker reported by distributor | Patient monitor PM-5Lot 25-031 | Medium | Not started | AKA. Khan | Triage |
| PMS-0415Unexpected result, repeat test differs | IVD analyser QX-1Reagent lot R-882 | High | 04d 19h | SRS. Reid | Investigating |
| PMS-0422Packaging seal complaint, portal | Infusion set IS-12Lot 25-204 | Low | Not started | AIAgent | Intake |
| PMS-0409Service record: battery fault | Patient monitor PM-5Lot 24-990 | Medium | 09d 02h | JPJ. Patel | Follow-up |
Select a case to open its record. Devices, lots, people and timers are illustrative.
Source message · distributor email
Extracted fields
Timeline
- Email received and case created09:12
- Device, model and lot matched09:13
- Duplicate check: 1 linked case09:13
- Reportability proposal awaiting sign-off09:20
Linked cases
Proposed: reportable serious incident
Alarm failure on a device whose alarm is a risk control. A recurrence could lead to serious deterioration in health. Criteria from the manufacturer's PMS procedure are cited below.
Criteria checklist
- An incident occurred involving the device
- The device is suspected to be a contributory cause
- ?Outcome could have led to serious deterioration in health
- Similar event found in linked case PMS-0392
The lead confirms or overrides. Each decision is stored with its rationale.
Missing-field prompt
Submission log
RA review requested · J. Patel
● awaiting approval
follow-up report scheduled
Open 2
Investigate 1
Implement 1
Effectiveness check 1
Actions by stage, owner, due date and effectiveness check. Customer notifications are tracked with each FSCA.
Open signals
Slice by
Data sources
Reviewer comments
Stricter rules, same old spreadsheets
GB post-market duties got stricter in 2025. Most small manufacturers still run them on spreadsheets and inboxes.
Working records and reviewer responsibilities
A post-market surveillance hub built on DeX, set up around your PMS plan and running in your cloud.
Reading, drafting and chasing
Every report is read, coded and matched to device and lot. Drafts and reminders go out automatically.
Decide every report, risk and submission
Each decision is logged with its rationale.
Follow one complaint from inbox to inspection-ready
Here's what happens to a single complaint. Hover over it to pause.
Complaint arrives
Tools for post-market teams
Email, web form, distributor upload and API into one case.
Pulls device, event, outcome and coding terms from free text.
A proposed decision with reasoning, for human sign-off.
A statutory timer per case. Escalates before breach.
Pre-filled vigilance and periodic reports in the current format.
Separate obligations, applied to the same case.
Owners, effectiveness checks and customer notices.
Dashboards by device, lot, failure mode and market.
Role-based access, approvals and full change history.
PMS plan, SOPs and past decisions, searchable.